The Canberra Liberals went into the 2012
Assembly Election with a very scant policy on public transport, and with Jeremy
Hanson assuming the role of Opposition Leader in 2013, ACT Light Rail thought
it would be a good idea to meet with him and sound him out on his ideas
concerning public transport and light rail in Canberra.
The meeting was very wide ranging over a
number of policy areas concerning Canberra, but I will focus on transport
policy for this article.
In a nutshell, the Hanson led Liberals will
continue to oppose the Capital Metro project. They have a number of grounds for
this stance:
- They aren’t convinced of the economic case for light rail put by the Government
- They support redevelopment along Northbourne but do not believe it would receive any advantages from light rail
- They have doubts about the ALP government’s ability to deliver the Capital Metro project on time and on budget
- They believe that the money can be better spent elsewhere
- With the Territory budget not in surplus, they don’t believe we should be spending money on projects of this size
ACT Light Rail are well aware of these
positions as they are consistent with the barrage of press releases on the
Capital Metro program issued by MLA Alistair Coe several months ago. As we said
at the time, the position is understandable, except that the Canberra Liberals
have no better public transport position or policy alternative to offer.
Disappointingly Jeremy didn’t mention the Infrastructure Canberra proposal from their 2012 Assembly election policy platform. That policy was very appealing as it looked to create a body that would oversee major capital and transport infrastructure, with forward planning and an integrated approach (unlike the current method with multiple departments overseeing multiple major projects, and little forward planning outside the electoral cycle).
He conceded that he liked the concept of
light rail, but felt it would be better suited to Canberra at some point in the
future. This argument is one that really surprises me from a politician
(although I have heard it many times before). It is either lip service to fob
off public transport advocates or a genuine belief that a light rail system is
required, if the latter is the case, then it’s a matter of making it a policy
priority and working to deliver a community benefit.
We did get into a discussion on the
relative merits of the current Capital Metro proposal serving Gungahlin and
Civic, but not other parts of Canberra such as Tuggeranong. Our position is
that we may never use a sewage pipe in Theodore, but we don’t oppose
infrastructure being built there. Borrowing money to build infrastructure is
not the same as borrowing money to run day to day operations.
One area of Capital Metro that ACT Light
Rail and Jeremy Hanson agree on is the poor site chosen for the Park and Ride
to service the Capital Metro. Current plans indicate it will be located next to
the Mitchell Resource Transfer facility. Locating the Gungahlin area park and Ride
in Mitchell is not a good idea. Once a driver from Nicholls reaches Mitchell,
human nature dictates they will continue driving to their destination. It would
be better to build a multi storey carpark in the Gungahlin Town Centre at
either end of Hibberson Street with the ground floor dedicated to retail and
services that commuters would need. A well designed park and ride could service
current Gungahlin retail parking requirements and future transport driven
parking demand.
Jeremy Hanson also observed that in his
recent campaigning for the Liberals in Canberra, only one person had spoken to
him about light rail. He see’s no political advantage in supporting it, and
doesn’t believe a pro light rail position would enhance the Liberal vote in any
way. He believe that voters want two cars per family and a double car garage,
that they love their cars and aren’t interested in public transport or light
rail. He points to the 8% public transport patronage figure to support this
belief.
This belief will cost the Liberal Party
votes as the population of the Northbourne Avenue-Flemington Road corridor
increasingly densifies, as the opportunity for that is created by a proper mass
transit technology in light rail. The voters choosing to live near public
transport are more likely to be able to have a one car family and live in a
medium to high density housing form that is not a suburban block with a
standalone home and a double garage.
Policy differentiation does matter to
voters and the Labor Party capitalized on this last year with the initial
Capital Metro proposal. A single Green MLA determining government forced the
ALP into bringing forward a plan that may not have survived four years of
majority Labor government in the territory. The differentiation in policy here
is clear – the ALP had public transport policy, the Canberra Liberals do not.
Politicians need to stop viewing public transport as a social service and view it as an alternative to the private car. Once they share this mindset, they will understand that investment in transport infrastructure does not disadvantage drivers to the advantage of public transport users, it provides an advantage to all.
The Canberra Liberals have legitimate
concerns over the ability of the current government to deliver the Capital
Metro project on budget and on time, as it does not have a good record of major
project delivery. The other objections are ideological and need revisiting. The
management of a four billion dollar economy provides the Territory with
opportunities to satisfy all areas of public need from hospitals to transport
and everything in between. Delaying a much needed modal shift to light rail is
not in the long term interests of the territory and would lead to lost
opportunities to redevelop Northbourne Avenue, increasing road congestion and a
loss of productivity that will continue to grow.
Last year they had the opportunity
through their Infrastructure Canberra policy proposal to develop a coordinated
leadership role in Canberra’s growth. Their current opposition to Capital Metro
needs to be revisited as it will not be viable at the next Assembly election,
when the construction work for light rail along Northbourne will have begun in
earnest, and contracts for rolling stock and depot construction will have been
signed.
Jeremy Hanson did point out that ultimately
the Canberra Liberals support or opposition to light rail would be a policy
decision, not a political decision. ACT Light Rail believe that the Canberra
Liberals are on the wrong side of politics and policy on this matter, and the
votes that are won by investing in an integrated public transport network will
go to the parties that support and promote a livable city for all residents,
not just those forced by location and economic necessity to be a two car family
due to a lack of public transport alternatives.
