From the Canberra Times April 21 2013
Tony Trobe talks to Peter Newman, Curtin University professor of sustainability and author of Towards a More Sustainable Canberra.
TT: Does Canberra need a light rail?
PN: Canberra
is one of the most car-dependent cities in the world. It has the
highest car use per capita of all Australian cities and its public
transport is in decline after being one of the best cities in Australia
for buses. All cities in Australia that have built rail options in
recent years are rapidly growing in public transport patronage. Most
cities with rail across the globe are growing rapidly in this option. US
cities building light rail have had growth of about 6 per cent per
year. Car dependence is increasingly an economic, environmental and
social burden. Cities that are heavily car dependent will be less
competitive, more vulnerable to oil and carbon constraints and more
inequitable.
TT: Does Canberra deserve a light rail?
PN: At
last count, there were 545 cities with light rail. There are now 118
cities with populations under 150,000 that have light rail or are
constructing light rail. It is no longer the case that any city must be
large and dense to deserve a rail system. That was said about Perth and
was proved wrong. Each of Perth's north and south corridors that have
had a rail project constructed were about the size and density of
Canberra, each were dramatically successful due to their careful
integration with feeder buses and each were bitterly opposed by
transport planners stuck in an old paradigm. The recent election was
fought almost entirely on which rail options were preferred - in
reality, both the Coalition's MAX light rail and the Opposition's
Martinet heavy rail will be needed and will eventually be built. All the
small cities of Australia are planning light rail including Hobart,
Newcastle, Cairns, Darwin, Geelong and even Parramatta.
TT: Can Canberra pull off a light rail?
PN: A
Canberra light rail will need to have a good benefit-cost ratio. It
will need to be part of an integrated plan with bus feeders and
integrated ticketing and it will need a clear land-use plan, showing how
it will help create a more productive and sustainable built form in
Canberra. The latest tool for enabling this to happen is value capture.
It can mean underused land near the train could be sold off or developed
as part of the package to fund the line. A more sophisticated version
is based on the reality that residential and commercial properties near
the new rail service will increase substantially in value. The
beneficiaries will be paying more for rates and taxes that are
land-value based. Part of this increased return to the government's
coffers can be hypothecated to help finance the rail line. It requires a
clear plan to help the land development near the rail to be more dense
and mixed. . It's certainly worth a try.
Tony Trobe is the Australian Institute of Architects' ACT president.
Light rail = trams. What we really need is a proper train (train) service from Lanyon via Tuggeranong Town Centre, Wanniassa Shops, Mawson Shops, Phillip, Woden Town Centre, West Deakin, Parliament House/Hyatt and Civic.
ReplyDeleteThat would provide superior passenger catchment and economic development compared to a tramway from Civic to Gungahlin.
In my humble opinion.